Simplify3D User Forum

DForbes

M4nusky wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 5:59 pm +1
definitly a bug

Yep same here, found out the hard way by waisting a day chasing this around, what the hell man?

DForbes

Max, you are a frikin genius! You saved my bacon today as my Windows machine crashed and I lost everything. Went to my S4 and pulled a few Gcode files and bam, there they are. Thanks man!

DForbes

This exact scenario came up a week or so ago. The extra "infill" is being generated by the slicer to fulfil either the specified number of top layers or the specified number of bottom layers....and manifests itself where you have a sloping surface...as zemlin has identified. The cure is t...

DForbes

Hello, been having this problem since the release of 4.0. When S3D processes a vertical radius it creates a jagged inner wall (see pics below) vs a smooth line which is causing shifting layers from the violent vibration. I have duplicated this several times and is very consistent. In order to correc...

DForbes

Changing thin wall parameters have no effect because that's no way anywhere near being a thin wall! Can you attach a factory file for this part so someone can see exactly what is happening. Two screenshots are totally inadequate. First of all, I was under the impression this is a support forum so I...

DForbes

Hey guys, trying to get rid of the green zig-zag infill (Thin Wall.jpg). I have tried altering thin wall behavior and nothing seems to change. The only way I can change this is to change my layer height from 0.300 to 0.210 or lower. When I change to 0.210 layer height than I get a smooth 2 outer she...

DForbes

Hoping someone with Simplify 3D experience can help. I am running multiple processes and I am seeing a gap in the preview. My processes are broken down like this. - Process 1 = 0 - 65mm @ 0.300 layer height - Process 2 = 65mm - 95mm @ 0.210 Layer height - Process 3 = 95mm to complete @ 0.300 Layer h...

DForbes

Just because the software doesn't behave the way you believe it should, it doesn't mean there's a bug! The way to manually adjust the generated support is as follows: 1) Set the support to auto-generate support....but set the resolution to a high value so that no support can be generated. 2) Open t...

DForbes

Thanks for all of the replies! I tried the 9999 for bottom layer and it worked great. The mistake I was making was not really understanding how infill worked. I though if you had 100% infill than that meant "solid layer" but after paying more attention to the colors I realized I really wan...

DForbes

OK, probably been discussed before but everything I am reading is not getting me closer to an answer. How do you print an object SOLID, no infill and I mean 0 infill? What settings do need to make this work?

Thanks,

Dennis

Search found 11 matches

Re: Changing the scale of a model does not maintain the scale percentage value V5

Re: Recovering Lost Processes

Re: Jagged walls causes printer to shake

[FIXED] Jagged walls causes printer to shake

Re: Thin Wall Behavior

Thin Wall Behavior

[FIXED] Skipped Layer Using Multiple Processes

Re: Removed Supports still being generated and printed

Re: Making a part SOLID

Making a part SOLID