Search found 16 matches

Go to advanced search

by 3DWP
Mon May 20, 2019 2:27 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Flashforge Creator3
Replies: 4
Views: 212

Re: Flashforge Creator3

OK ,thanks. I have sent a mail so I hope I will be informed. I didn't get it to work with the Creator myself yet.

I hope you guys can get a profile out soon.
by 3DWP
Fri May 03, 2019 2:19 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Flashforge Creator3
Replies: 4
Views: 212

Re: Flashforge Creator3

I am also waiting for this.. I really thought I would be printing with it more but I miss a Simplify3D profile. At Flashforge they say they sent a Creator 3 to S3D but a profile is still missing..
by 3DWP
Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:06 am
Forum: General Discussion and Tips
Topic: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0
Replies: 80
Views: 13211

Re: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0

I agree that paying for upgrade is the norm for most software companies but I am having a hard time with doing so with S3D because from all the testing I have done with it and other slicers (which are free), there is not enough extra features to warrant it.. Yes the interface is fairly easy to use ...
by 3DWP
Sun Feb 24, 2019 2:26 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Tips
Topic: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0
Replies: 80
Views: 13211

Re: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0

Yay, me too, bought on october 2018 and would be rather annoyed to see an eventual fee for the 5.0 release. If that will be the case I will consider having bought S3D a straight up "bad investement". Otherwise I would say it is actually a good investement since the software IS actually good and HAS...
by 3DWP
Thu Feb 21, 2019 2:16 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Tips
Topic: S3D Settings Manual
Replies: 14
Views: 6190

Re: S3D Settings Manual

Incredible, looks great! Thanks for sharing. :lol:
by 3DWP
Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:28 am
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: S3D Misses The Mark On Weight And Time Esimates By A Lot!
Replies: 9
Views: 876

Re: S3D Misses The Mark On Weight And Time Esimates By A Lot!

That is indeed very annoying. It's the one part I really hate about Simplify3D, the terribible undercalculation of time. And for the last update they promised great improvements in time calculation and even showed a stopwatch like it's spot on - it's still not! It's not uncommon for my prints to tak...
by 3DWP
Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:08 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Support separation gap, raft speed, and auto arrange distance management
Replies: 5
Views: 803

Re: Support separation gap, raft speed, and auto arrange distance management

I got a message that the support separation gap feature request was forwarded to the development team. I really hope they will add this, to be able to set the vertical distance between (dense) support and model material would be great. Different materials and layer heights require different distance...
by 3DWP
Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:01 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Tips
Topic: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0
Replies: 80
Views: 13211

Re: Paid upgrade For 2019 upcoming Version 5.0

In another thread somebody posted a ''Way back machine'' link and as far as I can see Simplify3D never stated you would get free updates for life. I have a S3D license for years now and have received a couple of free updates and don't expect or demand this to be free forever. I'm happy with what I h...
by 3DWP
Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:18 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Profile handling
Replies: 16
Views: 1755

Re: Profile handling

I would really like to see this changed. Profiles are just not easily managed in S3D now.
by 3DWP
Thu Dec 06, 2018 6:02 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Support separation gap, raft speed, and auto arrange distance management
Replies: 5
Views: 803

Re: Support separation gap, raft speed, and auto arrange distance management

I also would lik to see this as an added feature. I think raft and support separation gap should/could be the same. I have seen with other slicers and printers this actually works. I had to print a lot of models with 0.3 mm layer height and the bottom surfaces just looked terrible because of the mas...

Go to advanced search