Simplify3D User Forum

Deifox

Let me apologize in advance brian442. In no way did I mean for any of this to sound like I was arguing with you. What you have said has been 100% accurate and I agree with your remarks. I just feel that we got a little bit off topic with the material use. (Which is a logical debate), and again, we c...

Deifox

Your absolutely right about the longer rectangular parts... a circle raft would just be a dumb idea. I forgot to point out that I was referring to smaller more equally dimensional parts, and as for the poor comparison, your kind of missing the point... I wouldn't run a raft at a 0 offset, because th...

Deifox

Ok, correct my math if it's off, but if I were to print a cube with 5mm sides, and use the standard 5mm offset for my raft setting. This would give me a raft area of 225mm squared. But if I were to print a circle that was no bigger than the furthest outside edges of the cube, it would only be (rough...

Deifox

I see it differently, I believe you'll use less material than a squared off raft. Because you can make the raft smaller without having to worry about curling, and I mean so small that the outer diameter of the raft isn't any bigger than the parts furthest outside edge. Right now I have to run a good...

Deifox

I've been printing in pc abs, and I've been getting a lot of warping. So to combat this, I've been using a raft. This way the raft corners curl, instead of my part. But the other day I noticed something, my round parts don't curl. (Or at least not as much) This makes sense to me because of the round...

Search found 5 matches

Re: Raft options

Re: Raft options

Re: Raft options

Re: Raft options

Raft options