Search found 4 matches

Go to advanced search

by xepherys
Sun Apr 28, 2019 12:48 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Ironing
Replies: 70
Views: 39740

Re: Ironing

mixdup wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 4:02 am
I too would love to see this feature, however a smart version that allows for all or some top surfaces to be ironed. A manual tool much like the "Add support" method in reverse would be awesome.
Cheers
Ah nice - that's a really good idea!
by xepherys
Sun Apr 28, 2019 12:47 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Adjustable infill
Replies: 18
Views: 4359

Re: Adjustable infill

+1. I've wanted this too. It allows you to more easily print with more space infill. AND... It's not that hard. They already do this exact thing with dense support layers for support material. All they have to do is use the exact same logic for infill layers. Dense infill layers: <N> -> Number of d...
by xepherys
Mon May 21, 2018 4:54 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Adjustable infill
Replies: 18
Views: 4359

Re: Adjustable infill

Edit: While the cube could easily be done by adding more processes that change based on height, the big use of this would be where you have an irregular surface, such as a topographical map for instance where the ground gently rises across the print. The increase in infill would only be near the lo...
by xepherys
Mon May 21, 2018 4:34 pm
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Ironing
Replies: 70
Views: 39740

Re: Ironing

It would be a nice feature. Honestly, the earlier comment in the thread about "ripping off" other slicers is... well it's kind of silly. None of these things are patent or copyright. All modern slicers exist solely because they "ripped off" a previous software. Honestly, for the price of S3D, I woul...

Go to advanced search