Search found 16 matches

Go to advanced search

by ceondraka
Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:38 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Weird infill at perimeter
Replies: 11
Views: 331

Re: Weird infill at perimeter

It might be adding that material to give the infill something to attach to. I see this frequently on other models before the infill goes in
by ceondraka
Tue Nov 05, 2019 12:37 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Weird infill at perimeter
Replies: 11
Views: 331

Re: Weird infill at perimeter

Can you change the coloring on the preview to the Feature Type and repost the above image to see what type the squiggly line is. That will help diagnose what it is.
by ceondraka
Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:53 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: missing dense support when combining every 2nd layer
Replies: 7
Views: 909

Re: missing dense support when combining every 2nd layer

SOLUTION: OK attached is my factory for this part and if you do the following you can see where the issue is and why its happening. ASSUMPTION: Combine support layers applies to both regular and dense (it looks like it from the simulator) ISSUE: Open the Factory file and review. With combine support...
by ceondraka
Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:33 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Not applying bridging
Replies: 6
Views: 591

Re: Not applying bridging

Ok.... Got it to work had to drop the unsupported area threashold way down to 35 and now it's calculating and inserting bridging. Will try print tonight to see if it changes the result.
by ceondraka
Mon Nov 04, 2019 3:20 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Not applying bridging
Replies: 6
Views: 591

Re: Not applying bridging

Will do when I get home. Don't have access to the files on the road.
by ceondraka
Mon Nov 04, 2019 1:14 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: missing dense support when combining every 2nd layer
Replies: 7
Views: 909

Re: missing dense support when combining every 2nd layer

BUMP - I just ran into this problem also and I think I figured out why it's happening. Printing an object with supports set and combine every (2). Also have dense supports at 2 layers. I think it's not printing when the dense supports fall in-between the combined support value and it cannot combine ...
by ceondraka
Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:51 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Not applying bridging
Replies: 6
Views: 591

Re: Not applying bridging

I'm seeing this also on certain features where it's not calculating bridging. I have a 18mm wide gap in a wall that is 4mm wide and the slot is 2mm tall (I'm thinking this is the issue with such a small valley under the bridge). I removed the suggested supports as the bridge area is 2mm above the su...
by ceondraka
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:06 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: Better Profile management PLEASE?
Replies: 22
Views: 3454

Re: Better Profile management PLEASE?

I'd like to +100 for a better layout/method for multiple printer list/layout of profiles. I have a large list and wish they were sorted or grouped by machine. I have a 3 digit machine code at the beginning of the profile to know which profile goes with which machine..... Good Idea if implemented.......
by ceondraka
Fri Aug 30, 2019 4:39 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Print Time Estimate is way off
Replies: 2
Views: 161

Re: Print Time Estimate is way off

I did...... But version 4.1 was supposed to improve on the estimates......... I'm not seeing any improvement My estimates were better in earlier versions. Now on 4.1.2 they seem to be getting worse. Also best not to assume because I only have 8 posts that I'm a noob. Day job is estimating/programmin...
by ceondraka
Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:53 pm
Forum: Troubleshooting and Bug Reports
Topic: Print Time Estimate is way off
Replies: 2
Views: 161

Print Time Estimate is way off

I'm running a snapmaker 1.0 3 in 1 machine. Have no problems with printing except the time estimate is really off. Example: Printed the Baby Groot at 50% height and the estimate said 6 hours and 54 min. Actual was 8 hours and 24 min. (Granted some of that was the heating of the bed and nozzle (but n...

Go to advanced search