Simplify3D User Forum

gearsawe

or use smaller support grid. 4mm never works for me. use the 1mm.
another hack I have found is scale to 200% add 1mm supports then scale down to 50%
the support will scale with the model! think this is a bug. then the support are 0.5mm

gearsawe

so have seen this issue couple times. 5.0 tends to "heal things" it thinks are close enough. if the support structure is a completely separate part have a process for each. This should solve the problem. what is the gap between the support structure and the model? seems like anything less ...

gearsawe

yes is sort of possible but if the part where just a clone it would allow you to very easily be able to nest and rotate each clone into position without the need to edit infill angles, seam positions, supports, support angles. They would be clones and not a bunch of different processes for each obje...

gearsawe

+1 to bring back define "custom angle pattern" rather than the default being a 90deg offset from the one angle we define now.
I find myself needing the original from v4 more. Cura has this custom option, I feel like the new way in v5 got degraded a bit unhappy with this choice.

gearsawe

I run into this problem when a part with a large internal opening then place a couple small part inside the opening. Those smaller inside the large opening don't get a brim. this might solve that issue. Have even tried 2 processes and still does not work

gearsawe

and then things were removed in 5.0 which are still not back in 5.02. I better not have to wait for 6.0 and have to pay for something again that was originally in 4.0

gearsawe

I have often done this in the model directly. to beef up the walls where I might tap the holes for threads. creates a separate cylindrical feature in widths of the nozzle. this is great to control exactly where you want to add multiple walls. kind of like this 23_24_20_10_15_236.png Just showing you...

gearsawe

+0.5 nice to have. did not even know this was a thing. just an odd term Monotonic... mono-directional fill maybe?

gearsawe

it was my understanding, look at the the single slice and does not produce a offset surface around the model. with 0 offset the support will be right up against the bead where the model. A 0.2 offset should be a 0.2 gap horizontally. One setting I did find messes with this a little is the dimensiona...

gearsawe

did you mean profiles?

Search found 233 matches

Re: Support extruding to the top of part

Re: Connecting surfaces that shouldn't in 5.0.1

Re: Parent/Child "clone" mode

Re: V5 Infill Internal/External angle offsets?

Re: Please add Skirt/Brim setting for internal regions. (See Attached)

Re: Will there be a 5.0.3?

Re: different values for external vs internal perimeters

Re: Monotonic Top/Bottom infill

Re: Horizontal offset of supports

Re: Processes disappear every Windows update