Post Reply
busby
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 5:19 pm

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Sun Feb 16, 2020 5:21 pm

+1 for me on this, it would be so helpful to have this feature. Have you ever tried to find the sweetspot with PETG to stop stringing alone :D
brotherdust
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:16 pm

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:18 pm

+1. I just bought Simplify3d today and was disappointed by the lack of this feature. Even the free slicers have it. I prefer using firmware retraction. Please implement this. It's been requested for 3 years now.
chriscog
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:27 pm

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:40 pm

+1 here too. Doing some g-code hacking it appears the CR10-V2 software (Marlin) does a fine job, I think coordinating with the ooze control (K factor, if I remember correctly.)
Godsmack0226
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:00 pm

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:33 pm

+1
Manu512
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:21 am

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:47 am

+1. I just bought Simplify3d today and was disappointed by the lack of this feature. Even the free slicers have it. I prefer using firmware retraction. Please implement this. It's been requested for 3 years now.

I think I don't keep S3D after testing period. Speed en mm/min was boring too.
parallyze
Posts: 226
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 4:18 am

Re: Request: Firmware Retraction

Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:50 pm

Manu512 wrote: ↑
Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:47 am
 I think I don't keep S3D after testing period. Speed en mm/min was boring too.
Using firmware retractions does require replacement steps, yes. But setting speeds to mm/s is just one click
inside the general options... :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “Feature Requests”