Omikron
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:20 pm

Re: Ironing

Fri Sep 25, 2020 7:50 pm

rrileypm wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 5:28 pm
It just seems like clicking a box if you want ironing or not wouldn't be too much to ask for...whether the developers think it is useful or not. There is plenty of support for it on this thread.
I don't think it is either, but then again neither is honest, direct, communication about what's going on with product development.

It seems that for the past two years they've been putting all of there eggs in the "save it for V5" basket. Ironing was one of the first reasons I switched to supermerill's fork of Slic3r, formally called Slic3r++ and now called SuperSlicer. It's not as pretty as S3D, and Slic3r's support material generation downright sucks compared to S3D's, but it also has VERY active development and is updated constantly with new features and bugfixes.

Here's hoping a new version of S3D is actually released soon, and that ironing is part of it.

Trickflow
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:34 pm

Re: Ironing

Sat Dec 05, 2020 9:36 am

+1 for this.
My top layer from a free slicer looks substantially better than my top layer from S3D. Not short selling S3D I use it over Cura for all the other amazing features. Just want to be able to finally delete Cura :D

maj
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 9:40 pm

Re: Ironing

Wed Feb 24, 2021 9:55 pm

I switched from Cura and was generally very satisfied ... until I printed something with a flat platform (see picture). I have tweaked the settings in multiple ways, and nothing compares to the smooth surface I used to print with Cura. There's much to like about S3D, but if I can't reliably produce a smooth, flat surface to print with it, then this is a waste of money and time.

The finished print invariably has shallow ridges and detectable (small) gaps. The transition to/from the platform is a real challenge.
Attachments
Screen Shot 2021-02-24 at 9.42.54 PM.png

Return to “Feature Requests”