jlspea01
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:24 pm

Re: Feature request

Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:26 pm

+1

It's kind of silly that we dont have this. With rectilinear, the amount of layer-to-layer adhesion is reduced since the layers only touch at overlap. For honeycomb, the adhesion is much higher resulting in stronger builds.

CT4
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:13 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Feature request

Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:15 am

+1

tmoore
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:27 pm

Re: Feature request

Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:48 pm

Honeycomb infill is definitely something I would like to see.

bubbasnow
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:54 pm

Re: Feature request

Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:06 pm

+10

Jbc
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:04 pm

Re: Feature request

Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:10 am

+1

MasterFX
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 11:23 am

Re: Feature request

Tue May 20, 2014 11:28 am

+1 for Honeycomb

davedfx
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:54 am

Re: Feature request

Sun May 25, 2014 2:33 pm

we need different types of infills and more controls.

Currently the infills are weak especially when used with multiple infill angles say 90,-90, 45, -45. S3d currently lays each line per layer. The default use random infill placement makes things even weaker.

I can hear the infill break when applying pressure to surfaces.

The add solid diaphragm is an odd solution to strengthen parts.

MasterFX
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 11:23 am

Re: Feature request

Sat May 31, 2014 7:28 am

davedfx wrote: I can hear the infill break when applying pressure to surfaces.
Excaly what I observed. The Honeycomb of Makerware etc. seems to be much more stronger.

Return to “General Discussion and Tips”