Page 2 of 2

Re: Feature request

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:26 pm
by jlspea01
+1

It's kind of silly that we dont have this. With rectilinear, the amount of layer-to-layer adhesion is reduced since the layers only touch at overlap. For honeycomb, the adhesion is much higher resulting in stronger builds.

Re: Feature request

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:15 am
by CT4
+1

Re: Feature request

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:48 pm
by tmoore
Honeycomb infill is definitely something I would like to see.

Re: Feature request

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:06 pm
by bubbasnow
+10

Re: Feature request

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:10 am
by Jbc
+1

Re: Feature request

Posted: Tue May 20, 2014 11:28 am
by MasterFX
+1 for Honeycomb

Re: Feature request

Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 2:33 pm
by davedfx
we need different types of infills and more controls.

Currently the infills are weak especially when used with multiple infill angles say 90,-90, 45, -45. S3d currently lays each line per layer. The default use random infill placement makes things even weaker.

I can hear the infill break when applying pressure to surfaces.

The add solid diaphragm is an odd solution to strengthen parts.

Re: Feature request

Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 7:28 am
by MasterFX
davedfx wrote: I can hear the infill break when applying pressure to surfaces.
Excaly what I observed. The Honeycomb of Makerware etc. seems to be much more stronger.