18.54 x 18.39? If you increase that by 6% you're close to the right size. Are you sure S3D isn't generating s3g/x3g for a Rep 2? A Rep 2 has 6.3% fewer steps per mm than a Rep 1. If the gcode was converted to s3g/x3g for a Rep 2 but then printed on a Rep 1, then the print would be 6.3% undersized. That 6.3% increase would give you 19.7 x 19.5 mm which is more in the correct ballpark. Alternatively, Wanhao may have put 18T pulleys on your bot instead of the typical 17T pulleys for a Rep 1.raffo333 wrote:Hi there, ive made allot of tests and this is my best so far:#
I used the replicator 1 profile with 0.75 Extr. Multi. infill 100%
Its not bad, the corners are not perfect but my main issue now is accuracy
my 20x20x test cube measures 18.54x18.39
What can i do to be more precise ? other than just scale the object...
Thanks in advance