I am aware that simple users have no obligation, this is not the debate.
As already said in the discussion, thank you for reading the posts from the beginning, I do not have to come on a forum to disturb users while the S3D team should integrate the information in the guides.
I only had information on the {PREPEND} command \ n "} this morning and I do not have time to test immediately.
As my post was not exclusively about the G28 the subject is not yet closed because the link given by horst.w requires more research, I still have to test the variables and possibly still take time to users who compensate the work to be improved by the S3D team ...
S3D is not a cheap freeware, the S3D team and no you should be more involved, keep doing their job and they will never improve ...
The S3D team should think about the inexperienced users and warn them before spending the license cost that the setting for some printers may require a good level of knowledge ...
Best regards Sir Ýwirlybird
+
I had tried in start tab :
{PREPEND "G28 \n"}
{PREPEND G28 \n}
PREPEND "G28 \n"
PREPEND G28 \n
G28 ; home all axes
Results in Gcode file's :
; horizontalSizeCompensation,0
G90
M82
M106 S0
M140 S100
M104 S230 T0
M109 S230 T0
{PREPEND "G28 \n"}
{PREPEND G28 \n}
PREPEND "G28 \n"
PREPEND G28 \n
G28 ; home all axes <- bad position
As you can see, the generated Gcode file is still not good even when trying various syntaxes.
I am very pissed because at the beginning I could not test S3D on time to cancel the sale, the S3D team refused me the refund of this software when I already saw a difference in quality of finish compared to Kisslicer.
Reminder of the picture of my bad start during my first tests of S3D :

Also a comparison of use of S3D on two machines, a kit modified by me, the K8200 renamed K8200UM and a Flashforge Dreamer:

This is the same STL used with exactly the same process settings, the result with one Dreamer is poor face to K8200 one poor machine...
I don't be happy with S3D and not counting the other problems reported in my other two unanswered posts.
If I do not forgive the flaws of expensive software, it is for the good of all.
If S3D works very well on machines overpriced it must be the same for all machines listed as compatible otherwise it must prevent before purchase or correct so that this software has at least the same capabilities as a freeware !!!
I would like not to waste more time and not to lose to others that the S3D team manifests itself so that at least I can use their software too expensive like a freeware !!!
OK for all ?