Important improvement request

[magopic93]

Many software like cure or prusa slicer have become better lately. In my opinion there are several problems.
1) supports: there should be the possibility of inserting different models of tree type supports and also the automatic recognition is not as optimal as that of care

2) the possibility of being able to choose more infill models than those that are now would be welcome

3) On care there is an important function such as ironing for surfaces with better quality. It would be useful to implement it

4) heavy problem on printing time. It is not possible to print a model with forecast 15 h and then it ends after 24 h.

[S3D-Jake]

Many software like cure or prusa slicer have become better lately. In my opinion there are several problems.
1) supports: there should be the possibility of inserting different models of tree type supports and also the automatic recognition is not as optimal as that of care

2) the possibility of being able to choose more infill models than those that are now would be welcome

3) On care there is an important function such as ironing for surfaces with better quality. It would be useful to implement it

4) heavy problem on printing time. It is not possible to print a model with forecast 15 h and then it ends after 24 h.

Thanks for your feedback! To allow our team to better track the volume of such requests, please provide your feedback in the preexisting threads for these topics.

1) viewtopic.php?t=11822

2) Cubic: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=6898
Adaptive: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=8619
3D Honeycomb: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=5037
User-defined custom infills: viewtopic.php?t=1275
Gyroid: viewtopic.php?t=10289

3) viewtopic.php?t=8187

4) viewtopic.php?f=23&t=12822