dkightley wrote:
I'll say it again..... there is actually no underextrusion. The only change is the height of the nozzle!!! Exactly the same amount of plastic is extruded.
I never said there was a visible indication of underextrusion. I said I'm not sure if the preview shows underextrusion at all.
(Do lines get thinner if playing around with the extrusion mutliplier? I've never tried).
parallyze wrote:I'm not sure if the g code preview shows underextrusion.
So... where's the difference between:
parallyze wrote:
As you can see the preview always draws preview lines with a certain "thickness". I'd say it's just the way it is shown which may lead to think it's underextrusion. But if a layer is only 0,04mm (like it's the case with 20%) the preview somehow has to display this properly - hence the first layer
is drawn a bit lower.
and
dkightley wrote:
As a first layer height under 100% results in the amount of plastic being extruded not being reduced, the simulation draws the layer height as the same as if it was 100%, but...and an important but...the simulated layer is drawn at a lower height so that the top is at the reduced height. The layer is consequently drawn part above the bed....and part below the bed.