Page 3 of 4

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:18 am
by Jbc
IceSL has a feature they are playing with.
I've never used the software but found their developers are working on a lot of different things.

Here is a pic of their minimal infill approach-
Minimal Infill.png
A feature like this will help so much with time and material cost.
more and more people are casting their models in a ceramic shell and having less material to burn out saves so much time/money.

+1

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2019 3:39 pm
by S3D-Jake
These are all great ideas. Thank you so much for your feedback! We'll be documenting these as new infill options for future releases.

Keep letting us know what you as a community want to see in our software! :D

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:47 pm
by dylanhoen
I also vote Cubic Infill. I also had an idea about a porous infill for a speaker box. Cubic, with a little diamond shaped hole in the center of each face for air flow. That might work better with gyroid infill, though, which already lets air flow. It would also require infill with one of the bounding walls cut out. Maybe select an outer face to delete after infill is added.

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:10 pm
by 1hander
another vote for cubic infill, i that infill on a friends prints and was jealous.. we printed the same part with the same infill, outer and base layers and his cura part was stronger than the one i made with S3d

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:33 pm
by gwhite
Yet another vote fort cubic infill. Due to the required print orientation, the model I'm printing now will be weaker than it could be with sparser infill. With S3D, I'm running increased infill for strength, which means it's taking more time & more filament.

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 1:55 pm
by ketukil
+1 for cubic (and gyroid) infill pattern :-D

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:24 pm
by Judge
+1

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Sat May 09, 2020 2:30 pm
by MrFixit44
For a lot of Prints Cubic is a must. Small pillars benefit from the trussing that occurs. Please consider making this an infill option.

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Sat May 23, 2020 3:09 am
by stdekart5827
Cubic Subdivision would be great to see! Let the software decided on the density and size of the infill.

Re: Cubic infill

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:20 am
by maddavo
+1 for cubic infill - S3D should definitely have this.

For the length of time that this request has been around, and the "advanced" nature of S3D - to not have this and many other infill options is quite poor. I would go further to say that we should have far more customisable infill options and patterns than we do now - some kind of scripting with variables would allow us to create all kinds of infills.