Page 1 of 1

Alternative plan of cooling method

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 11:02 am
by ViperZ
Creating prime pillars to ensure cooling time wastes filaments.
Adding a wait time setting as shown in the following figure to the Ooze shield option eliminates filament waste by the prime pillar and easy to control the cooling time.
How about this?
無題.jpg

Re: Alternative plan of cooling method

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 11:15 am
by ViperZ
Benefits of this method
 Reduction of filament waste.
 Cooling time can be specified in seconds.
 Since unnecessary printing runs out, it reduces the mechanical load of the printer.
 Easy to develop programs of this function.

Re: Alternative plan of cooling method

Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 7:38 pm
by arhi
I don't understand how is ooze shield using less filament then prime pillar? If you can elaborate I'd be grateful :)

As for using the "wait time"? Note that if you just do "dwell" (G4) you will have oozing so you do need to prime your nozzle before you start printing after G4, IMO something like:

1. move to a predefined "safe" XY position (XY configurable of course)
2. execute G4 with some seconds, where this "seconds" value should be configurable as "constant for all layers" or "constant - layer time"
3. prime
4. continue printing

In any case, adding DWELL support to S3D +++++++++++++++++++++++ from me :)

Re: Alternative plan of cooling method

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:32 am
by ViperZ
As shown in the figure below, OOzeShield thinks that filament consumption is less than PrimePiller.
無題.jpg
I made a program to convert GCODE files with C #.
It is currently under adjustment.
無題3.jpg
In addition, I am creating a conversion function corresponding to the contents described below.
f=9&t=7436


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sorry. I'm not good at English. I am using Google Translate.
Therefore, I may not understand all your advice.

Thank you.

Re: Alternative plan of cooling method

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 10:42 am
by ViperZ