[ADDED] Speed - mm/minute? Why not mm/sec?

[rsilvers]

The standard is to think in terms of mm/sec. This program uses mm/minute. Why? I have to multiply and devide by 60 to think about what it means.

[vOidward]

An option for MM/sec would be nice for those of us from Makerbot land.
ReplicatorG, MakerWare and Slic3r use mm/sec, so mm/min really has no association in my brain.

[madeinoz]

An option for MM/sec would be nice for those of us from Makerbot land.
ReplicatorG, MakerWare and Slic3r use mm/sec, so mm/min really has no association in my brain.

+1

[tintinz]

+1

[barsam]

+1

[Jeff]

Yes, Please make mm/s..

[Festus440]

I was really hoping for furlongs per fortnight.......

Kidding aside, mm/sec is certainly more intuitive, especially for small parts.

[Ozy]

+1

[marcnicol]

+1

[vinny1575]

+1